Month: December 2017

Bitcoin Code Software Review Is Bitcoin Code SCAM Or LEGIT?

Bitcoin Code Software Review Is Bitcoin Code SCAM Or LEGIT? Fight Back With Joy Blog Is The Ultimate Guide To Start Investing With Bitcoin Code Software and Cryptocurrency Industry

Bitcoin Code

Bitcoin Code Inflation is a rising and continuous level of prices in the economy due to the decline in the value of money, and there is only one reason for inflation, including the case of attracting demand, ie when the demand for supply increases prices, and there is a case of payment of expenses when the cost of industry, Prices are higher, and some of the external factors such as high prices of raw materials such as petroleum, which affects the balance of payments and thus the stability of the local currency, are also included in the causes of inflation.

Bitcoin Code Software

Bitcoin Code Software Proof


Inflation in the economic sense is weak purchasing power of the currency, if ten units of the country’s currency buys a kilogram of meat or two fractures in the present time, then weakened the purchasing value of the currency after a year and became the price of kilos of meat or the value of the two fractions equivalent to fifteen units of local currency , It means that inflation occurred at a significant rate of 50%. Therefore, the investor who has long tied his money with an acceptable return at the time of the beginning of the investment has become a loser, not because of his poor choice of the Bitcoin Code investment channel, but because another factor, inflation, has spent a lot of the value of his investment. Inflation is a must. Things are soaring. The value of money in front of commodities is less than three years ago. It is now $ 25, which is inflation. Acceptable, reasonable and predictable inflation is small and may not exceed half or 1 per cent per year when the country’s economic situation is sound and correct. An inflation rate of 1-2% can not be considered a bad sign, but if inflation exceeds this rate, this means a major economic imbalance.

Bitcoin Code Scam

The high rate of inflation is frightening for investors because inflation means a real decrease in the value of their funds associated with that investment, as well as the low value of the returns they expect from their investments. The alternatives to the investor are many, and when one chooses one, he connects his liquid money to it, and then returns his money, which is less valuable than it used to be, and it would have been better if he had spent it in other purchases, he would have received valuable goods. An inflationary commodity such as land and real estate would have been better for it. If a man invested his money in bonds that give him a profit of 7% per annum and the rate of inflation is 4%, it means that his profit has fallen, and it is only 3%.

Bitcoin Code Login

The Bitcoin Code Login prices of a variety of goods, including food, clothing, fuel, appliances such as computers, as well as a range of services such as the cost of laundry or cars, are taken into consideration. The value of the purchase of these goods in each month, in the places displayed and sold to the public, and the value of the purchase for different periods, usually a month or a quarter (three months), defines the amount of inflation and the amount of change in the price group and not in just one commodity. If there is a half-per-cent increase in prices, that means there is inflation in this amount.

The second way to measure inflation:

A measure of the source is the sampling of the prices of the goods and their pricing from the first product, ie the amount of the price determined by the product for its goods, and from these prices, it is possible to know the direction of the price line to rise or fall.

The value of one commodity is not taken into account, but it is an important factor in determining the cause of inflation or high prices. Hence, we hear of the great pressures on Oil producers, in an attempt by other countries buying or consuming oil to reduce prices, because it is one of the goods that led to the rise of the inflation index.

Some researchers have found that the dynamic relationship that quantum theory gives to money on the effect of change in the quantity of money at the price level is not as simple as the theory. Prices may rise for reasons that have no income to change the amount of money. The changes that the theory attributes to the interpretation of the mechanism of inflation, namely the amount of money and the speed of circulation or demand and the volume of production are not independent of each other. On the one hand, some in the interpretation of the inflation mechanism suggest that it is fixed that the change in the overall level of prices often affects the amount of money, since the price movements themselves often cause changes in monetary factors. High prices, especially if large, would initially lead to faster circulation of money and eventually increase the amount of money.

But after the emergence of new theories, quantitative theory is no longer acceptable to explain the mechanism of inflation. The expansion of governments in the issuance of money, the policy of cheap money in wars and the associated significant waves of inflation, were the basic pretexts of quantitative theory proponents in analyzing the mechanism of inflation.

Whatever the reasons for theories and schools to explain the mechanism of inflation, the mechanism of inflation does not take a single approach in practice. They differ from country to country depending on the level of socio-economic development and structural structure of the national economy.

Bitcoin Code Software Review

There is a profound difference in determining the reasons for this phenomenon, or the factors leading to it. Quantitative theory in money can be considered the first theory that attempted to know the causes of inflation and the mechanism that determines the general level of prices and fluctuations that occur at this level.

In contrast, there is another picture to explain the phenomenon of inflation and determine the causes found in the “Cambridge equation” and in the context of the theory of the amount of money. In this interpretation, the authors of this equation relied on the idea of ​​demand for money, which is the size of cash balances that individuals wish to keep for purposes of exchanges. In other words, the amount of money held by individuals in the period between their receipt of money and the date of spending, and monetary balance is achieved when the required amount of money equal to the amount of supply. So that the general level of prices in this case becomes stable and there is no inflation.

At the beginning of his intellectual activity, Keynes was a supporter of the modern classical school. He was influenced in particular by the ideas (Fix, Hayek and others) m who see in cash as a means of deliberation. The reasons for inflation are mainly due to the amount of money offered to achieve commodity exchanges. Keynes viewed cash as a stock of value as well as his function as a medium of exchange, his analysis as limited developments to indicate the Cambridge equation. The equation of cash balances that individuals wished to keep for trading as well as the concept of cash turnover.

Under these developments, the first beginnings of Keynes’ analysis of the role of income and expenditure in the light of the relationship between money, interest rate, investment, savings and the general price level appear. Keynes, in his analysis of the framework of quantitative theory of money, no longer looks for the effect of money on prices in quantitative terms, as I went to that quantitative theory of money. But by knowing the impact of the change in the amount of money on the interest rate and the impact of this price on investment. In other words, Keynes used a set of equations whose aim and significance are to capture the relationship between national income, consumption, investment, prices, costs and productivity. To explain this, the expansion of the amount of money leads to lower interest rates and this leads to imbalance between investment and savings as the volume of investment is greater than the size of savings. The natural consequence of this is that investors are making extraordinary profits that drive investors to more investment financed through bank credit. If full operational assumption is assumed, increased demand for factors of production should lead to increased unit cost and higher price. In other words, the general price level. In fact, Keynes‘ early findings were only a reverberation of Vixel’s ideas, which had the merit of examining the impact of interest on the relationship between investment, saving and the overall price level.

Keynes’s book on operation, interest, and money in 1936 formed a revolution against classical thought. In terms of inflation, Keynes’s analysis is based on fluctuations in national expenditure (consumption, investment and government spending) as the main determinant of price and operating levels, using new analytical tools such as multipleir and accelerator instead of fluctuations in the amount of money. The tools used by Keynes finally crystallize in the interaction between the total demand forces and the post-access status to the full operational level.

In the first case, prior to full operation or full utilization of productive capacities, increased aggregate demand, especially demand for factors of production, usually increases the supply of goods and services, increases sales movement and generates extraordinary profits. Which drives investors to increase the employment of productive capacities and labor, leading to the emergence of inflationary trends before reaching the state of full operation. These trends are called partiel due to the lack of certain factors of production coupled with increased demand or because of the pressure of union to raise wages at rates that are not commensurate with the rate of increase in productivity or the result of monopolistic tendencies to achieve extraordinary profits.

In the second case, the full operating state, the increase in effective demand is not offset by an increase in supply (supply elasticity 0). Inflation in this case comes as a result of the increase in aggregate demand for total supply increased significantly and then the emergence of sudden rises in prices. In other words, inflation is the result of excess demand beyond production capacity. In other words, inflation appears as a result of an increase in the demand for consumer goods and factors of production from supply so that the inflation gap is formed.

Indeed, Keynesian analysis of the causes of inflation is due to economist Wicksell, who was the first to criticize the classical concept of inflation, which is attributed to the increase in money supply. Vixel’s analysis, built on the increase in effective demand, found a confirmation in Keynes’ general theory. There is, however, a fundamental difference between the VIXEL analysis and the kinase analysis. The Keynesian school focused its attention on the increase in demand for consumer goods and factors, assuming that the imbalance in consumer goods markets had a direct impact on the balance in factor markets, particularly the labor market. Vixel has built his analysis of inflation on the basis of the increase in demand for consumer goods and ignore the impact of the increase in demand for factors of production.

In the wake of the Second World War, research and studies on the diagnosis of causes of inflation expanded. Most of the new trends during this period were a mixture of quantitative theory and Keynesian theory. These studies include those by Keynesians and their attempts to introduce dynamic kinetic analysis into Keynesian theory by using differencial equations to determine the causes and factors determining the speed of evolution or stability of the inflationary gap. The most important of these innovations, however, is the renewal introduced by the Modern Swedish School, represented by Tomas Lindahl, which crystallized in the wake of the 1930s, in the midst of waves of unemployment and depression. What distinguishes this school is that it makes expectations particularly important in the critical analysis of inflation. Unlike Keynesian theory, the Swedish school sees that the relationship between total demand and aggregate supply depends not only on the level of income, as Keynesian theory suggests, but on national expenditure plans on the one hand and national production plans on the other. Saving. This theory holds that there is no reason to believe that planned investment is equal to savings achieved (except in equilibrium). Because investors’ desires and motivations differ from those of savers. Thus, the inequality between planned (or expected) savings and planned (or expected) investment leads to fluctuations in the overall level of prices. In the case of increased planned investment for planned savings, this means that demand is greater than supply and therefore leads to higher prices. Thus, the difference between planned savings (or planned investment) and actual investment (realized investment) is reflected in a surplus (demand surplus) In the consumer goods markets, and another gap (demand surplus) in the factors of production markets, as well as an extraordinary entry achieved by producers as a result of higher prices. In sum, the main thrust of modern Swedish school thinking in inflation is the thinking that gives pivotal importance to expectations in interpreting the inflationary gap. In general, this school is involved in its analysis of the monetary and financial markets.

A few decades ago, a wide range of economists adopted the quantitative theory of money as a theoretical guide to explain the causes of inflation. Milton Friedman and supporters of the Chicago School were the most famous advocates of this theory. However, the first theoretical concerns of the neo-conservatives of the theory of the quantity of money had begun since the mid-fifties of this century and completed maturity and clarified its main sections in the sixties. But the ideas of this group of economists, led by Milton Friedman in the seventies and gained more supporters who are known as critical. In fact, under the new developments, the reasons for returning to the quantitative theory of money and the secret of its popularity can be understood in its quantitative form.

In the wake of the setback of Keynesian theory and its Bitcoin Code policies, the ideas of the Chicago school spread in this favorable atmosphere and declared that there was no long-term relationship between inflation and unemployment. Inflation is purely monetary and has nothing to do with rising wages and labor struggles. The main reason for inflation is if money is growing faster than growth in production.

According to contemporary theory, the relationship between the average cash balance for the unit of production and the level of prices should not be overly simplified or mechanically understood. Two main factors affect this relationship:

1 – Change in production volume.

2 – Amount of money that individuals wish to keep.